Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store
![Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "TRANSFORMERS #8 Cvr E 1:50 Image Comics 2024 Skybound 0324IM294 8E (CA) Ezaceta"](https://www.seibertron.com/images/ebay/comic-books/image/transformers/08E/t-DSC06077.jpg)
steve2275 wrote:the likes of alldarker kurn and revengeofstarscream would help
I need them to enter and have the results matter
Advantages such as this will be fully mapped out in advance in future for two reasons: one, to ensure that they can be peer reviewed and do what is intended, and two, in case I am unavailable to implement changes for whatever reason, the game doesn't grind to a halt. Ideally, they would be removed alltogether.Wingz wrote:The shard would have been a good idea had it rotated.Psychout wrote:Was the Shard [for the big final battle] a good idea, or did that just make things worse in your opinion?
Optimus_Prime007 wrote:Maybe if we had some more bots/maximals. Wingz, Steve, Servant, Sumo, myself, gets thin after that.
I know the changes that will be coming should help attract some new players or possibly older players to the game. Just got to find a way to make a fair playing field that Wingz is alluding to. I am hoping this will help out with the numbers problem.
Psychout wrote:Advantages such as this will be fully mapped out in advance in future for two reasons: one, to ensure that they can be peer reviewed and do what is intended, and two, in case I am unavailable to implement changes for whatever reason, the game doesn't grind to a halt. Ideally, they would be removed alltogether.
Tekka wrote:What she doesn't realize is that Springer actually loves Rodimus.
-Soundwave- wrote:I'm a little disappointed you only get one vote. I'd have liked two. But probably best this way.
Psychout wrote:-Soundwave- wrote:I'm a little disappointed you only get one vote. I'd have liked two. But probably best this way.
What's the other one you'd gave votes for?
-Soundwave- wrote:Psychout wrote:-Soundwave- wrote:I'm a little disappointed you only get one vote. I'd have liked two. But probably best this way.
What's the other one you'd gave votes for?
I voted for the Scavenger hunt, but then I'd have added the total war.
Bun-Bun wrote:Can I change my vote to "The kind of event that doesn't lose all it momentum halfway through because the site has an aneurysm" ?
Naked Magnus wrote:Hey, sorry, stupid question here. What does rebooting the map mean?
Bun-Bun wrote:Naked Magnus wrote:Hey, sorry, stupid question here. What does rebooting the map mean?
I couldn't find the most recent map showing all the territories the Cons won but here's the post with the original
Naked Magnus wrote:Bun-Bun wrote:Naked Magnus wrote:Hey, sorry, stupid question here. What does rebooting the map mean?
I couldn't find the most recent map showing all the territories the Cons won but here's the post with the original
Ah, ok. It is something that is manually updated then as part of the tournament.
steve2275 wrote:a total kills in a week tourney would be cool
when it starts post # of team kills
go from there
perhaps bonus point multiplied by level stasis locked (110 point against sky shuttle
sprockitz wrote:making numbers competing on both sides equal is good, but levels should also be relatively equal. I think that's more important than having the bots that pick a partner need to match their level...they should match to get the levels across the competition equal.
Psychout wrote:sprockitz wrote:making numbers competing on both sides equal is good, but levels should also be relatively equal. I think that's more important than having the bots that pick a partner need to match their level...they should match to get the levels across the competition equal.
Easier said than done, but it's a good point.
Dropping clause 5 from here might help address that, we just have to hope that the players chosen without it fill the gap. If the players just aren't there though, there is little we can do unfortunately.
sprockitz wrote:Psychout wrote:sprockitz wrote:making numbers competing on both sides equal is good, but levels should also be relatively equal. I think that's more important than having the bots that pick a partner need to match their level...they should match to get the levels across the competition equal.
Easier said than done, but it's a good point.
Dropping clause 5 from here might help address that, we just have to hope that the players chosen without it fill the gap. If the players just aren't there though, there is little we can do unfortunately.
oops, that was the thread I meant to respond in
Return to Heavy Metal War Forum
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Darius Silverton, Gauntlet101010, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], MSN [Bot]