Shadowman wrote:The problem is that you're a smug ****, and no one wants to listen to a thing you have to say. For example, every conversation you've been involved with on this site. Or specifically, how SKYWARPED_128 was trying to help you...but then you went and ruined that, causing him to turn around and admit that I was right.
And now that I'm thinking about it, that is hilariously ironic. You want to change people, and you did! Unfortunately, you changed him to my way of thinking. Which is that you're a smug ****.
No good deed goes unpunished, and all that.
SlyTF1 wrote:The problem with that, though, is that I'm not pretending.
I'm not trying to be defensive. All I'm doing is telling you like it is. The problem isn't with me, it's with the human condition. And that's what I'm aiming to change with my writing. Maybe not human nature itself, but the way people perceive it. Right now, my goal is to challenge just one person's view of human nature. If I can do that, everything else can fall into place. Though, the characters in my stories aren't human, I still use them to reflect certain aspects of the typical human constitution.
Let's not even get into that for now. What drives you to write? What, in the shortest possible sentence you can manage, and in the clearest way, describes your vision of what and how humanity should be?
All that stuff about philosophy and challenging people's minds means nothing if you can't answer that question. Go ahead and post that very same statement you made on Orson Scott Card's hatrack.com in his Q&A section; he'll tell you the exact same thing.
And more importantly, you're writing to entertain--nothing more. If people want to be educated and read philosophy, they'll buy a book on philosophy. Weaving your beliefs into the story is a byproduct of your work, but not the purpose of it.
Another published author whose name escapes me has this to say about a writer's priorities.
It goes something like this:
"No one 'needs' to read your work. If you think you're doing anything more noble than to keep a guy entertained for the time it takes to finish those 300 or so pages, you need to get off your high horse."
And to tell a proper story, you have to first ask yourself that question. It will be the driving force of all your stories.
All I keep hearing from you is that you hate the human condition, yadda yadda yadda, but you never get into the specifics. Every answer from you is like a carousel, going in circles with the illusion of forward movement.
Just follow the template below:
James O'Barr: feels a need to experience a reckoning for the death of his fiancee, and pens The Crow as a comic.
David Gemmell: looked up to his stepfather as a child, and loved the spirit of the Alamo. Also had a false alarm in his fifties thinking he had cancer, and went on to write the Drenai saga, focusing on camaraderie and the strength of will in aging men.
Hideaki Anno: Suffers from severe depression, and thus creates Neon Genesis Evangelion, which centers around a boy with no will to live, but is placed in a position to usher in the end of days.
SlyTF1: ???
And in case there's any doubt: against my better judgment, I am
still trying to give you constructive writing advice. No, you didn't ask for my help, but the nosy-ass Good Samaritan in me just can't help it.